Congress should not authorize strike on Syria; positive results not guaranteed

It is hypocritical to fight bloodshed with bloodshed.

On Tuesday, top lawmakers, including Republicans John Boehner and John McCain, met with President Barack Obama and confirmed their support for military action in Syria following the country’s use of chemical weapons. This means the United States is one step closer to striking the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. All that stands between Obama and military action is congressional approval.

The majority of The Daily Orange Editorial Board agreed that Congress should not authorize a strike on Syria because of the country’s use of chemical weapons.

Striking Syria does not guarantee positive results. The situation is reminiscent of past overseas military debacles, like those in Iraq and Afghanistan, which have left Americans with a bad taste on their tongues.

The government should carefully consider the fact that this strike could lead to another war for the country.

There are too many uncertainties surrounding Syria for Americans to support a strike. Rumors remain about who actually used chemical weapons in Syria. Some reports say it was not Assad who issued the chemical weaponry, but outside sources, like Saudi Arabia.

How can Obama strive for support for a strike when there remains uncertainty about the source of the chemical weapons?

It is crucial to consider immediate alternative solutions to end the killings in Syria. Several weeks ago, more than 1,400 Syrian citizens were murdered by chemical warfare, more than 400 of them children. It is morally irresponsible not to step in and help the country’s people. However, a more peaceful approach is necessary.

Until Americans know all of the details about Syria and the government provides greater transparency about its plan to strike, Obama should refrain from striking Syria.

Before more blood is shed, Obama should consider a well-rounded lineup of options to end the slaughter in Syria.

The situation in Syria must come to an end, but using violence to curb violence is not the correct immediate solution to the problem.